Overview
Aggravation, in law, is "any circumstance attending the commission of a crime or tort which increases its guilt or enormity or adds to its injurious consequences, but which is above and beyond the essential constituents of the crime or tort itself".
 | You can help expand this article with text translated from the corresponding article in Russian. (May 2026) Click [show] for important translation instructions.
|
Aggravation, in law, is "any circumstance attending the commission of a crime or tort which increases its guilt or enormity or adds to its injurious consequences, but which is above and beyond the essential constituents of the crime or tort itself".[1]
Aggravated assault, for example, is usually differentiated from simple assault by the offender's intent (e.g., to murder or to rape), the extent of injury to the victim, or the use of a deadly weapon. An aggravating circumstance is a kind of attendant circumstance and the opposite of an extenuating or mitigating circumstance, which decreases guilt.
In the UK, the Criminal Justice Act 2003 requires a court to consider (a) relevant previous convictions, (b) racial or religious aggravation, and (c) hostility towards the victim or to persons generally based on sexual orientation (or presumed sexual orientation) or disability (or presumed disability) when determining sentence for a conviction.[2]
The antonym of aggravation is mitigation.
In canon law, "aggravation" was a form of censure, threatening excommunication after three disregarded admonitions.[3]
Aggravating Factors in Sentencing
In criminal law, aggravating factors refer to those facts that make the offence more serious and increase the culpability of the offender and may necessitate a harsher sentence to be imposed. The difference between the aggravating factors and the essential elements of the offence is that while the latter have to be proven to secure the conviction for an offence, the former are considered during the sentencing phase. Aggravating factors are used by the courts to impose a suitable sentence having in mind the nature of the offence and the circumstances of its commission.[4][5]
While the list of aggravating factors varies from one jurisdiction to another, some general factors are considered in many criminal justice systems. Such aggravating factors include the commission of a crime using a weapon or threats to do so, causing serious injuries either physically or psychologically, commission of an offence against a child, old people or any other vulnerable victim, misuse of authority, offences committed out of prejudice, previous convictions, organised crimes and the premeditated commission of the crime.[4], [6], [7]
The differentiation of elements of the crime from aggravating factors is one of the distinctive features of many sentencing procedures. Therefore, if certain conduct constitutes aggravated assault, there will be statutory aggravating factors present in the crime, while some aggravating factors, which are going to be determined during sentencing, will aggravate the punishment imposed but not change the initial conviction.[4], [6] It helps to differentiate the cases where different offenders have been convicted of committing the same crime but in different circumstances.
Legal scholars argue that aggravating factors help to increase the proportionality, consistency, and transparency of the sentencing procedure as they provide a basis for decision-making.[4] [7] In sentencing procedures, judges should explain how their decision making process was influenced by aggravating and mitigating factors to ensure that similar cases are treated similarly, although judges retain the right to consider every case individually.[6], [5]Also, international standards regarding criminal justice systems require the principles of fairness, proportionality, and circumstances of the crime and the offender to be taken into account in sentencing.[8]
References
- ↑ Black, Henry Campbell, Black's Law Dictionary, 6th edition. (St. Paul, MN: West, 1991)
- ↑ Criminal Justice Act 2003, sections 143, 145 and 146
- ↑ One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domain: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Aggravation". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 1 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 375.
- 1 2 3 4 "Sentencing and Criminal Justice 7th ed". www.wildy.com. Retrieved 2026-08-12.
- 1 2 Frase, Richard S., ed. (2012-12-14), "Preface", Just Sentencing: Principles and Procedures for a Workable System, Oxford University Press, p. 0, ISBN 978-0-19-975786-2, retrieved 2026-08-12
{{citation}}: CS1 maint: work parameter with ISBN (link) - 1 2 3 Bild, Jonathan (2012). "Mitigation and Aggravation at Sentencing by J.V. Roberts (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2011) 304pp. £60.00hb ISBN 978-0-521-19780-9". The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice. 51 (4): 432–433. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2311.2012.00729_4.x. ISSN 1468-2311.
- 1 2 Tonry, Michael H. (2011). The Oxford Handbook of Crime and Criminal Justice. Oxford University Press. ISBN 978-0-19-994025-7.
- ↑ "Compendium of United Nations Standards and Norms in Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice | Office of Justice Programs". www.ojp.gov. Retrieved 2026-08-12.
See also
 | This article about a criminal law topic is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by adding missing information. |