| Junk dollar has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: August 11, 2026. (Reviewed version). |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
- ... that a Chinese coin (pictured) was modified to avoid similarities to the Japanese rising sun?
- Source: Young, Arthur N. (1971). China's Nation-Building Effort, 1927-1937: The Financial and Economic Record. Hoover Institution. ISBN 9780817910419.To make the design harder to counterfeit, the junk was shown against rays of the sun with three gulls flying overhead. The latter features were promptly criticized, on the grounds that the rising sun suggested Japan [...] So these features were at once removed. pages 185-186
Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 13:56, 2 August 2026 (UTC).
- General eligibility:
- New enough:

- Long enough:

| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Moved to mainspace. QPQ done. Image is freely licensed under CC 4.0 (as per source link) and overall clear. Hook is properly cited. The content is interesting and no plagiarism issues. Good to go. Toadboy123 (talk) 07:32, 3 August 2026 (UTC)
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Junk dollar/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Generalissima (talk · contribs) 07:43, 28 July 2026 (UTC)
Reviewer: Kisseran (talk · contribs) 13:15, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
Claiming this. Review to follow. Kisseran (talk) 13:15, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, grammar, and understandability):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- See below.
- a (prose, spelling, grammar, and understandability):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section):
b (inline citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- See below for spot check. Earwig brings up nothing of concern.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All images are freely licensed or public domain with appropriate captions. Only note is that the obverse image has the year and not the date at the top. It says "中華民國二十一年".
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Prose
who reunified much of the country
— perhaps pipe link to Northern Expedition?- Done.-G
Chinese Republican date for the previous year
— as above I find it strange that "date" is used to denote only the year.- The year on coins seems to always be referred to as the 'date' in numismatic convention (I think because the year something is dated is not necessarily the year it was made, as seen here)
comparisons to the Rising Sun
— why pipe this link instead of just using "Rising Sun flag"? or perhaps "Rising Sun symbolism" for more clarity if it's not just about the flag.- Good point.-G
and most of the initial design were melted down
— most coins of the initial design?- Fixed.-G
Chinese Civil War
— wikilinkhyperinflation
— wikilinkand imported from abroad
→and import them from abroad
— or perhaps even justmint new junk dollars both domestically and abroad
- Well, they weren't minting them abroad, they were ordering others to mint them. First phrasing you suggested works though.-G
first made in Guangdong
- Fixed.-G
Two commemorative coins featuring President Sun Yat-sen (the memento dollar) and Vice President Li Yuanhong
— this is possibly a rare case of respectively being useful. I presume the sentence is saying that there was one coin featuring Sun Yat-sen and another featuring Li Yuanhong, rather than two coins both featuring both people.- Good point; fixed.-G
reunify China from its base in the south
— "its" is ambiguous here between referring to China and the KMT- Fixed.-G
poor-quality
→poor
- Done.-G
arcs the date of minting
— again I would write "year of minting" but I am not familiar with numismatics at all, so if this is a convention then feel free to ignore thisfineness
— wikilink perhaps- Added.-G
stated that the coins were popular with the public
— is there any reason to doubt this?- He was indirectly involved with its creation, so he's not a completely independent source.-G
was able to open
→opened
- Done.-G
Shanghai was taken by Communist forces
— this is probably beyond the GA criteria but I find it strange that you pipe to People's Liberation Army instead of just writing that.- Hmm, good point.-G
Spot check
This table lists 5 random passages from throughout the article (14.7% of 34 total passages). These passages contain 6 inline citations (14.3% of 42 in the article). Reference numbers refer to this revision. Generated with the Veracity user script.
| Reference # | Letter | Source | Archive | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| As the central mint in Tianjin had been rendered inoperable during the revolution, various provincial issues circulated, including restrikes of dragon dollars. Two commemorative coins featuring President Sun Yat-sen (the memento dollar) and Vice President Li Yuanhong, were created in 1912. | |||||
| 4 | a | Wright 1978, p. 149. | It seems to me that the source only says that the central mint was burned down in 1912, without indicating that it was the year that the coins were created. | ||
| Also in 1929, the Ministry of Finance ordered pattern pieces of the Sun Yat-sen dollar to be designed at five different nation's mints: Austria, Italy, Japan, the United Kingdom, and the United States. All five mints were given identical specifications, featuring Sun Yat-sen on the obverse and a sailing junk ship on the reverse. The Vienna Mint was additionally commissioned to produce 50, 20, and 10 cent pieces with the same design in correspondingly smaller sizes. None of these designs were used, likely again based off the accuracy of Sun's portrait. However, the reverse of the Italian design was reused for the eventual circulating issue. | |||||
| 14 | Kann 1953, pp. 196–200. | ||||
| The American economist Arthur N. Young praised the coin's design as attractive, | |||||
| 18 | Young 1971, p. 185. | ||||
| In November 1935, the Nationalist government passed a set of currency reforms, abruptly taking the currency off the silver standard and halting the production of silver coins, to be replaced by the use of paper money. | |||||
| 19 | d | Kann 1953, p. 201. | |||
| 23 | Wright 2003, p. 328. | ||||
| Mints in Taipei and possibly Chengdu also produced unknown amounts of Year 23 junk dollars in the latter half of 1949. | |||||
| 19 | e | Kann 1953, p. 201. | |||
@Generalissima: Reviewed. Kisseran (talk) 09:36, 11 August 2026 (UTC)
- @Kisseran: Thank you so much! Responded to the prose comments + added an extra cite for that issue with the year of production for the two commemorative dollars. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 13:32, 11 August 2026 (UTC)
